Der Prompt
You are a launch readiness specialist. Generate a comprehensive
pre-launch checklist tailored to this specific project.
## Project Context
- **Project:** [name, type, description]
- **Tech stack:** [framework, hosting, services]
- **Features:** ${key_features_that_need_verification}
- **Launch type:** [soft launch / public launch / client handoff]
- **Domain:** [is DNS already configured?]
## Generate Checklist Covering:
### Functionality
- All critical user flows work end-to-end
- All forms submit correctly and show appropriate feedback
- Payment flow works (if applicable) — test with real sandbox
- Authentication works (login, logout, password reset, session expiry)
- Email notifications send correctly (check spam folders)
- Third-party integrations respond correctly
- Error handling works (what happens when things break?)
### Content & Copy
- No lorem ipsum remaining
- All links work (no 404s)
- Legal pages exist (privacy policy, terms, cookie consent)
- Contact information is correct
- Copyright year is current
- Social media links point to correct profiles
- All images have alt text
- Favicon is set (all sizes)
### Visual Placeholder Scan 🔴
Scan the entire codebase and deployed site for placeholder visual assets
that must be replaced before launch. This is a CRITICAL category — a
placeholder image on a live site is more damaging than a typo.
**Codebase scan — search for these patterns:**
- URLs containing: `placeholder`, `via.placeholder.com`, `placehold.co`,
`picsum.photos`, `unsplash.it/random`, `dummyimage.com`, `placekitten`,
`placebear`, `fakeimg`
- File names containing: `placeholder`, `dummy`, `sample`, `example`,
`temp`, `test-image`, `default-`, `no-image`
- Next.js / Vercel defaults: `public/next.svg`, `public/vercel.svg`,
`public/thirteen.svg`, `app/favicon.ico` (if still the Next.js default)
- Framework boilerplate images still in `public/` folder
- Hardcoded dimensions with no real image: `width={400} height={300}`
paired with a gray div or missing src
- SVG placeholder patterns: inline SVGs used as temporary image fills
(often gray rectangles with an icon in the center)
**Component-level check:**
- Avatar components falling back to generic user icon — is the fallback
designed or is it a library default?
- Card components with `image?: string` prop — what renders when no
image is passed? Is it a designed empty state or a broken layout?
- Hero/banner sections — is the background image final or a dev sample?
- Product/portfolio grids — are all items using real images or are some
still using the same repeated test image?
- Logo component — is it the final logo file or a text placeholder?
- OG image (`og:image` meta tag) — is it a designed asset or the
framework/hosting default?
**Third-party and CDN check:**
- Images loaded from CDNs that are development-only (e.g., `picsum.photos`)
- Stock photo watermarks still visible (search for images >500kb that
might be unpurchased stock)
- Images with `lorem` or `test` in their alt text
**Output format:**
Produce a table of every placeholder found:
| # | File Path | Line | Type | Current Value | Severity | Action Needed |
|---|-----------|------|------|---------------|----------|---------------|
| 1 | `src/app/page.tsx` | 42 | Image URL | `via.placeholder.com/800x400` | 🔴 Critical | Replace with hero image |
| 2 | `public/favicon.ico` | — | Framework default | Next.js default favicon | 🔴 Critical | Replace with brand favicon |
| 3 | `src/components/Card.tsx` | 18 | Missing fallback | No image = broken layout | 🟡 High | Design empty state |
Severity levels:
- 🔴 Critical: Visible to users on key pages (hero, above the fold, OG image)
- 🟡 High: Visible to users in normal usage (cards, avatars, content images)
- 🟠 Medium: Visible in edge cases (empty states, error pages, fallbacks)
- ⚪ Low: Only in code, not user-facing (test fixtures, dev-only routes)
### SEO & Metadata
- Page titles are unique and descriptive
- Meta descriptions are written for each page
- Open Graph tags for social sharing (test with sharing debugger)
- Robots.txt is configured correctly
- Sitemap.xml exists and is submitted
- Canonical URLs are set
- Structured data / schema markup (if applicable)
### Performance
- Lighthouse scores meet targets
- Images are optimized and responsive
- Fonts are loading efficiently
- No console errors in production build
- Analytics is installed and tracking
### Security
- HTTPS is enforced (no mixed content)
- Environment variables are set in production
- No API keys exposed in frontend code
- Rate limiting on forms (prevent spam)
- CORS is configured correctly
- CSP headers (if applicable)
### Cross-Platform
- Tested on: Chrome, Safari, Firefox (latest)
- Tested on: iOS Safari, Android Chrome
- Tested at key breakpoints
- Print stylesheet (if users might print)
### Infrastructure
- Domain is connected and SSL is active
- Redirects from www/non-www are configured
- 404 page is designed (not default)
- Error pages are designed (500, maintenance)
- Backups are configured (database, if applicable)
- Monitoring / uptime check is set up
### Handoff (if client project)
- Client has access to all accounts (hosting, domain, analytics)
- Documentation is complete (FORGOKBEY.md or equivalent)
- Training is scheduled or recorded
- Support/maintenance agreement is clear
## Output Format
A markdown checklist with:
- [ ] Each item as a checkable box
- Grouped by category
- Priority flag on critical items (🔴 must-fix before launch)
- Each item includes a one-line "how to verify" note
So nutzt du diesen Prompt
Kopiere den Prompt oben oder klicke einen "Öffnen in"-Button um ihn direkt in deiner bevorzugten KI zu starten. Du kannst den Text dann an deinen Anwendungsfall anpassen — z.B. Platzhalter wie [dein Thema] durch echten Kontext ersetzen.
Welches KI-Modell funktioniert am besten
ChatGPT, Claude und Gemini liefern alle gute Ergebnisse für diese Art von Prompt. Claude ist meist am nuanciertesten, ChatGPT am schnellsten, Gemini am besten wenn visueller Input oder Google-Workspace-Daten involviert sind.
Diesen Prompt anpassen
Passe den Prompt an deinen konkreten Use-Case an. Ersetze Platzhalter (meist in Klammern oder Großbuchstaben) mit deinem eigenen Kontext. Je mehr Details du lieferst, desto präziser die Antwort.
Typische Anwendungsfälle
- In ChatGPT, Claude oder Gemini sofort einsetzen
- An dein spezifisches Projekt oder Branche anpassen
- Als Startpunkt für deinen eigenen benutzerdefinierten Prompt nutzen
- Mit verschiedenen Models vergleichen um das beste für deinen Fall zu finden
- Im Team teilen als Standard-Workflow
Variationen
Passe den Tonfall an (lockerer, technischer), ändere das Ausgabeformat (Aufzählungen vs. Absätze) oder füge Einschränkungen hinzu (Wortlimits, Zielgruppe).
Verwandte Prompts