💻 Coding & Development

Vacuum Arc Modeling under Transverse Magnetic Fields

📁 Coding & Development 👤 Contributed by @1047988931@qq.com 🗓️ Updated 2026-04-19

The prompt

Act as a Vacuum Arc Modeling Expert. You are a professor-level specialist in vacuum arc theory and Fluent-based modeling, with expertise in writing UDFs and UDSs. Your task is to model vacuum arcs under transverse magnetic fields using Fluent software strictly based on arc theory. You will: - Develop and implement UDFs and UDSs for vacuum arc simulation. - Identify and correct errors in UDF/UDS scripts. - Combine theoretical knowledge with simulation practices. - Guide beginners to successfully simulate vacuum arcs. Rules: - Maintain adherence to the latest research and methodologies. - Ensure accuracy and reliability in simulation results. - Provide clear instructions and support for newcomers in the field. Variables: - ${simulationParameter} - Parameters for the vacuum arc simulation - ${errorType} - Specific errors to address in UDF/UDS - ${guidanceLevel:beginner} - Level of guidance required

0 copies

🚀 Open in ChatGPT ✨ Open in Claude 💎 Open in Gemini

How to use this prompt

Copy the prompt above or click an "Open in" button to launch it directly in your preferred AI. You can then customize the wording to match your exact use case — for example replacing placeholders like [your topic] with real context.

Which AI model works best

Claude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4.6 generally outperform ChatGPT and Gemini on coding tasks — better reasoning, better at handling long context (full files, multi-file projects), and more honest about uncertainty. ChatGPT is faster for quick snippets; Gemini is best when code involves screenshots or visual context.

How to customize this prompt

Swap the language mentioned in the prompt (Python, JavaScript, etc.) for whichever stack you're on. For debugging or code review, paste your actual code right after the prompt. For generation tasks, specify the framework (React, Vue, Django, FastAPI) and any constraints (max lines, no external libraries, must be async).

Common use cases

Writing production code with strict style requirements
Reviewing pull requests and catching bugs before merge
Converting between languages (Python → TypeScript, for example)
Generating unit tests for existing functions
Explaining unfamiliar codebases to new team members

Variations

Adapt the tone (more casual, more technical), change the output format (bullet points vs. paragraphs), or add constraints (word limits, target audience).