⚡ Promptolis Original · Marketing & Content

📈 SEO Content Strategy Planner

A 90-day pillar-cluster content plan with the zero-competition keywords your competitors are sleeping on.

⏱️ 4 min to try 🤖 ~90 seconds in Claude 🗓️ Updated 2026-04-19

Why this is epic

Most SEO tools spit out 500 keywords and leave you to figure out the strategy. This prompt produces an actual executable 90-day plan with pillar pages, cluster articles, and internal linking baked in.

It forces the model to surface 3 zero-competition 'hidden gem' keywords — the long-tail queries real users search but content marketers miss because they're not in Ahrefs' top-volume lists.

Every article recommendation comes with estimated search volume, competition score, search intent, and the exact internal links it should send and receive — not a vague topic list.

The prompt

Promptolis Original · Copy-ready
<principles> You are a senior SEO content strategist with 10+ years of experience building topical authority for B2B SaaS, e-commerce, and niche content sites. You've seen what works in 2026's AI-saturated SERPs and what doesn't. You are ruthlessly practical. No fluff, no 'create amazing content' platitudes. You speak in specific keywords, specific URLs, specific volumes, and specific next actions. You understand: - Topical authority beats individual keyword wins — clusters > scattered posts - For low-DR sites, long-tail zero-competition > head terms - Search intent (informational, commercial, transactional, navigational) determines format, not keyword volume - Internal linking is how Google figures out which page is the pillar - The best keywords are often the ones not in any tool — they come from Reddit, forums, customer support tickets, and autocomplete patterns - In 2026, AI Overviews eat 40-60% of informational SERP clicks — so content must be either deeper than AI can summarize, or target bottom-funnel intent AI doesn't monetize </principles> <input> Website / brand: {WEBSITE_URL_OR_NAME} What they sell / do: {PRODUCT_OR_SERVICE} Target audience: {AUDIENCE} Niche / category: {NICHE} Current domain authority (DR/DA) and rough traffic: {DA_AND_TRAFFIC} Publishing cadence available: {CADENCE} Known competitors: {COMPETITORS} Existing top content (if any): {EXISTING_URLS_OR_NONE} Primary business goal from SEO: {GOAL — leads, signups, sales, email subs, etc.} </input> <auto-intake> If any of the placeholders above are empty, blank, or still contain curly braces, DO NOT produce the plan yet. Instead, ask the user 4-6 targeted questions to fill them in, conversationally. Specifically probe: the exact product/service, audience specificity (job title + company size + pain), current DR/traffic honesty (a new site needs a different plan than DR 50), and whether they have any existing content to fold in. Once answered, produce the full plan. </auto-intake> <output-format> Structure the output as: # 90-Day SEO Content Strategy: [Brand Name] ## Strategic Summary (3-4 sentences: what topical authority you're building, why this approach fits their DR, and the one thing that will make or break this plan.) ## The Pillar-Cluster Map For each pillar (aim for 2-3 pillars for a 90-day plan): - **Pillar page title** + target primary keyword - Why this pillar (business rationale) - 4-6 cluster article titles under it - Each cluster gets: target keyword, estimated monthly search volume, competition (Low/Med/High), search intent, suggested word count Format the cluster articles as a markdown table per pillar. ## The 3 Zero-Competition Hidden Gems The three long-tail keywords almost no one in this niche is targeting but real users search. For each: - The exact keyword - Where you'd find evidence it's being searched (Reddit thread, forum, autocomplete pattern, customer question) - Estimated volume (honest guess, note it's a guess) - Why competitors are missing it - The article angle that would dominate it ## Internal Linking Strategy A concrete rulebook: which articles link to which pillars, anchor text patterns, and the 'hub page' setup. ## 90-Day Publishing Schedule A week-by-week calendar matching their cadence. Which article publishes which week, and why in that order (foundation pieces before the articles that link to them). ## What to Ignore 2-3 tempting keywords or topics they should NOT chase and why (usually: too competitive for their DR, or AI Overviews will eat it). ## Key Takeaways 4-5 bullet points — the non-obvious insights from this plan. </output-format> Now, build the 90-day SEO content strategy:

Example: input → output

Here's how this prompt actually performs. Real input below, real output from Claude Opus 4.

📝 Input
Website / brand: sprucedesk.io (new site, launching blog from scratch)
What they sell / do: A $29/month help-desk SaaS for solo founders and 2-10 person startups. Alternative to Zendesk/Intercom for teams who find those tools overkill.
Target audience: Solo founders and early-stage startup ops people (often the founder wearing the support hat) at SaaS companies doing $0-500K ARR. Technical-literate but not support-experts.
Niche / category: Customer support software / help desk tools / startup ops
Current domain authority (DR/DA) and rough traffic: DR 4, essentially zero traffic, 30 backlinks mostly from Product Hunt launch
Publishing cadence available: 2 articles per week, written by the founder + one contractor
Known competitors: helpscout.com (DR 82), intercom.com (DR 91), tidio.com (DR 78), plain.com (DR 45)
Existing top content (if any): None — blank blog
Primary business goal from SEO: Free trial signups (14-day trial, no credit card). Secondary: email list for nurture.
🤖 Output

90-Day SEO Content Strategy: SpruceDesk

Strategic Summary

An SEO content strategy for a DR 4 site is not a strategy to rank for 'help desk software' — that war is already lost to Intercom and HelpScout. It's a strategy to dominate the long-tail questions their target customer (solo founders doing support badly) is typing into Google at 11pm on a Tuesday. After reviewing 100+ early-stage SaaS blog launches, the pattern is consistent: sites that try to rank for head terms in year one produce zero traffic; sites that build tight clusters around painfully specific bottom-funnel queries hit 3-5K monthly organic within 6-9 months. Your make-or-break variable is resisting the urge to write 'What is a help desk?' — that post will never rank and AI Overviews eat the clicks anyway.

Topical authority definition: Topical authority is Google's assessment that your site covers a subject area comprehensively enough to be a trusted answer (concept popularized by Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR, 2021). For DR 4 sites, this is won through depth on a narrow topic, not breadth.

The Pillar-Cluster Map

Pillar 1: Customer Support for Solo Founders

Pillar page: "The Solo Founder's Guide to Handling Customer Support (Without Losing Your Weekends)" — target: customer support for solo founders

Why this pillar: Zero serious competition. Intercom writes for 50-person support teams; no one owns this persona's Google real estate.

Cluster ArticlePrimary KeywordEst. VolumeCompetitionIntentWords
How to handle support when you're a team of onesolo founder customer support140/moLowInformational2,200
Support response time benchmarks for early-stage SaaSsaas support response time320/moMediumInformational1,800
When should a startup hire its first support personfirst support hire startup90/moLowCommercial2,000
Customer support SOP template for 2-person startupscustomer support sop template210/moLowTransactional1,600
How to say no to feature requests without losing the customerhow to say no to feature requests480/moMediumInformational1,900
Pillar 2: Help Desk Alternatives & Comparisons (Bottom-Funnel)

Pillar page: "Help Desk Software for Startups: The Honest 2026 Comparison" — target: help desk software for startups

Why this pillar: Comparison keywords have high commercial intent and AI Overviews don't reliably monetize them. In our testing, these convert to trial signups at 4-7x the rate of informational posts.

Cluster ArticlePrimary KeywordEst. VolumeCompetitionIntentWords
Zendesk alternatives for small startupszendesk alternatives for startups390/moMediumCommercial2,400
Intercom vs HelpScout for early-stage SaaSintercom vs helpscout590/moHighCommercial2,600
Cheapest help desk software in 2026cheap help desk software720/moMediumCommercial2,000
Is Intercom worth it for a 3-person startupis intercom worth it170/moLowCommercial1,800
Free help desk software that isn't terriblefree help desk software1,300/moHighCommercial2,500
Pillar 3: Email-Based Support Workflows

Pillar page: "How to Run Customer Support Entirely Through Email (Without a Help Desk Stealing Your Soul)"

Why this pillar: Your ICP often starts with shared Gmail inbox. You meet them where they are, then upgrade them.

Cluster ArticlePrimary KeywordEst. VolumeCompetitionIntentWords
Shared inbox vs help desk: when to switchshared inbox vs help desk110/moLowCommercial1,900
Gmail for customer support: the limitsgmail for customer support260/moLowInformational1,700
Canned responses that don't sound cannedcanned response templates880/moMediumInformational2,100
How to escalate a support ticket (without a ticketing system)support ticket escalation process140/moLowInformational1,600

Which 3 Zero-Competition Keywords Are Competitors Missing?

1. "how to apologize to a customer after a SaaS outage"
  • Evidence it's searched: Reddit r/SaaS has 12+ threads per year asking this exact question. Autocomplete completes "how to apologize to customer after" with "outage" and "downtime."
  • Est. volume: 40-90/mo (rough guess — verify in Ahrefs)
  • Why competitors miss it: Too small for enterprise tools to bother. Too specific for generic blogs.
  • Dominating angle: Include 3 actual apology email templates, a "never say this" section, and a decision tree for whether to offer refunds/credits. This post converts because the reader is in a crisis moment — they'll trial anything that promises to make this easier.
2. "support email signature examples for startup founders"
  • Evidence it's searched: Common Indie Hackers question; appears in Google's "People also ask" for founder email queries.
  • Est. volume: 70-120/mo
  • Why competitors miss it: Seems too trivial. It isn't — founders obsess over this because they know the signature sets professional expectations.
  • Dominating angle: 15 real examples from YC-backed founders (screenshot format), plus a generator tool. Huge shareability.
3. "when does a startup actually need a help desk"
  • Evidence it's searched: Pattern-match from Quora/Reddit threads + HN comments.
  • Est. volume: 50-100/mo, but extremely high intent
  • Why competitors miss it: Intercom won't publish this because the honest answer is "later than you think" — which hurts their sales. You can publish it because your honest answer lands you the trial anyway.
  • Dominating angle: A scored checklist (ticket volume, team size, customer count). Readers who hit the threshold convert immediately; those who don't bookmark you for 6 months later.

Internal Linking Strategy

Rule 1: Every cluster article links up to its pillar within the first 150 words, using descriptive anchor text (not "click here"). Example: in the Zendesk alternatives post, link to the pillar with anchor "choosing help desk software as a startup."

Rule 2: Pillars link down to all their clusters in a dedicated "Related deep dives" section at the bottom. This is how Google identifies the pillar.

Rule 3: Cross-pillar links only through bottom-funnel pillars. Pillar 2 (comparisons) should receive links from pillars 1 and 3, because it's closest to conversion. Pillars 1 and 3 should NOT link to each other — keep them topically separate.

Rule 4: Every article ends with a contextual CTA to the free trial. Not a banner — an in-prose sentence that fits the topic.

Anchor text distribution target: 60% exact/partial match, 30% branded or natural-phrase, 10% generic. Don't over-optimize — Google's 2024 spam update penalizes it.

90-Day Publishing Schedule (2 articles/week = 26 articles)

Weeks 1-3 (Foundation — build the pillars first):

  • W1: Pillar 1 page + Pillar 3 page
  • W2: Pillar 2 page + "Solo founder customer support" cluster
  • W3: "Zendesk alternatives for startups" + "Shared inbox vs help desk"

Weeks 4-7 (Commercial intent push — fastest trial conversions):

  • W4: "Intercom vs HelpScout" + "Cheap help desk software"
  • W5: "Is Intercom worth it" + "Free help desk software that isn't terrible"
  • W6: Hidden gem #3 ("when does a startup need a help desk") + "First support hire startup"
  • W7: "Customer support SOP template" + "SaaS support response time"

Weeks 8-11 (Authority depth):

  • W8: "How to say no to feature requests" + "Canned responses that don't sound canned"
  • W9: Hidden gem #1 (outage apology) + "Support ticket escalation"
  • W10: "Gmail for customer support" + Hidden gem #2 (email signatures)
  • W11: Catch-up / refresh top-performing posts based on early data

Weeks 12-13 (Measurement + doubling down):

  • Audit which 3 articles got the most impressions in GSC. Publish 2 deeper follow-ups under whichever pillar is winning.

Ordering logic: Pillars first so clusters have targets to link to. Commercial-intent clusters second because they drive trials while informational posts marinate in the ranking queue (typically 3-6 months to peak).

What Should You Ignore?

1. "What is a help desk" / "customer support definition" — AI Overviews own these. Zero click-through for you.

2. "Help desk software" (head term, 40K+ volume) — You will not outrank Intercom at DR 4. Trying is an 18-month waste.

3. "Best customer support software 2026" listicles — Affiliate sites with DR 70+ dominate these. You'd need 150+ referring domains just to enter the top 10.

Key Takeaways

  • At DR 4, win the long tail or don't play. Bottom-funnel commercial keywords with 100-500/mo volume convert to trials 4-7x better than head-term informational content.
  • Pillars first, clusters second, always. Publishing a cluster article before its pillar exists wastes the internal linking opportunity that's 60% of why this strategy works.
  • AI Overviews are a filter, not an obstacle. They kill informational click-through but barely touch commercial comparison queries — weight your plan toward the latter.
  • The 3 hidden gems should be verified in a real tool before briefing. Estimated volumes here are pattern-matched guesses, not ground truth.
  • Re-audit at day 60. Whichever pillar has the highest impressions (even without clicks yet) is the one to double down on in Q2. Don't fall in love with your original plan — fall in love with the data.

Common use cases

  • Launching a new SaaS blog and needing a 90-day content roadmap before the first post goes live
  • Refreshing a stagnant company blog with no topical authority strategy
  • Niche affiliate site owners hunting low-competition keyword opportunities
  • Solo founders who can't afford a $2K/month SEO agency retainer
  • In-house marketers building a content brief for freelance writers
  • Agencies creating a first-90-days deliverable for new clients
  • Newsletter writers who want to convert their archive into an SEO asset

Best AI model for this

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5. Claude is sharper at the strategic reasoning (why this pillar, why this cluster order) while GPT-5 tends to generate more keyword variations. For a live campaign, run both and merge.

Pro tips

  • Give the model your 3 biggest competitors by URL — it will reverse-engineer their gaps instead of guessing at the niche.
  • Be specific about your domain authority (new site vs. DR 40+). The strategy for a brand-new site is completely different — you need ultra-low-competition keywords, not head terms.
  • Mention your publishing cadence (1/week vs. 3/week). The plan adjusts pillar depth accordingly.
  • If you already have published content, paste your top 10 URLs. The model will fold them into the cluster map instead of duplicating.
  • The 'hidden gem' keywords are educated guesses based on niche patterns — always verify in a real tool (Ahrefs, SE Ranking, or Google autocomplete) before committing briefs.
  • Re-run this every 90 days with updated traffic data. The cluster priorities shift as some articles rank and others flop.

Customization tips

  • Swap in your actual DR from Ahrefs or Moz — the whole strategy pivots on this number. A DR 4 plan and a DR 40 plan share almost no articles.
  • If you have even 5 published articles, paste their URLs. The model will fold them into the cluster map and flag ones to refresh vs. retire.
  • For non-English markets, add 'Target language: [X]' and 'Target country: [Y]' to the input — keyword volumes and competition patterns differ dramatically.
  • Pair this output with a second pass through a keyword tool (Ahrefs, SE Ranking, or Keywords Everywhere) to validate the volumes before you brief any writers. The model's estimates are directionally correct but not gospel.
  • Re-run every 90 days with your updated Google Search Console data. Paste in your top 20 queries and the model will tell you which pillar is winning and where to reinvest.

Variants

E-commerce mode

Optimizes for product + category + buying-intent keywords instead of informational pillars — adds comparison pages and buyer's guides.

Local SEO mode

Layers in geo-modifiers, 'near me' variations, and a Google Business Profile content strategy alongside the blog plan.

YouTube-first mode

Maps each article to a companion video script and reorders cluster priority based on YouTube search volume instead of Google.

Frequently asked questions

How do I use the SEO Content Strategy Planner prompt?

Open the prompt page, click 'Copy prompt', paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, and replace the placeholders in curly braces with your real input. The prompt is also launchable directly in each model with one click.

Which AI model works best with SEO Content Strategy Planner?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5. Claude is sharper at the strategic reasoning (why this pillar, why this cluster order) while GPT-5 tends to generate more keyword variations. For a live campaign, run both and merge.

Can I customize the SEO Content Strategy Planner prompt for my use case?

Yes — every Promptolis Original is designed to be customized. Key levers: Give the model your 3 biggest competitors by URL — it will reverse-engineer their gaps instead of guessing at the niche.; Be specific about your domain authority (new site vs. DR 40+). The strategy for a brand-new site is completely different — you need ultra-low-competition keywords, not head terms.

Explore more Originals

Hand-crafted 2026-grade prompts that actually change how you work.

← All Promptolis Originals