⚡ Promptolis Original · Legal
📝 Simple NDA Drafter
Mutual + one-way NDA templates grounded in Uniform Trade Secrets Act, YC/a16z standard templates, common-law trade secret protection - specific Confidential Information definitions + reasonable duration + standard carve-outs.
Why this is epic
Most NDAs floating around the internet are unenforceable (too broad scope, perpetual duration, missing carve-outs). This drafter produces NDAs that courts actually uphold using Uniform Trade Secrets Act + California/Delaware best practices.
Ready-to-customize full NDA template with specific definitions, standard carve-outs (publicly known, independently developed, legally required), proper term + survival clauses, injunctive relief provisions, and state-specific governing law.
Distinguishes mutual (both parties share) vs one-way (only receiver bound) based on actual use case. Co-founder discussions = mutual. Vendor evaluation = one-way. Wrong NDA type destroys negotiation or creates unfair burden.
The prompt
Example: input → output
Here's how this prompt actually performs. Real input below, real output from Claude Opus 4.
Purpose: Partnership discussions with potential co-founder candidate. Will discuss product roadmap, current users, financial metrics, hiring plans. Parties: Disclosing: ACME Technologies, Inc. (Delaware corp). Receiving: Jane Doe (potential co-founder, individual). Mutual or one-way: Mutual Information type: Product roadmap, user + revenue metrics, hiring plans, technology architecture, business strategy. Jane shares: her technical capabilities, prior work product, consulting client list. Duration: 3 years State: California governing law Stakes: High - hundreds of hours of product + business plan sharing over 2-3 month evaluation Draft the NDA.
Your NDA Draft - Co-Founder Partnership Discussion
Agreement Type Check
Mutual NDA is correct choice here. Co-founder discussions involve both parties sharing confidential information.
3-year duration is reasonable for this context. Trade secret-tier information could warrant longer/perpetual protection via separate clauses.
California governing law: Good choice (California Civil Code Section 3426, trade secret protections).
NDA Draft (ready to customize)
MUTUAL NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
This Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement ('Agreement') is entered into as of ___________, 2026 ('Effective Date'), by and between:
'Company': ACME Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation with principal offices at _____________________ ('Company')
'Individual': Jane Doe, an individual with address at _____________________ ('Individual')
Company and Individual are individually referred to as a 'Party' and collectively as the 'Parties.'
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to engage in discussions regarding a potential co-founding partnership between Individual and Company (the 'Discussions');
WHEREAS, in the course of such Discussions, each Party may disclose to the other certain confidential and proprietary information;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS
1.1 'Confidential Information' means any and all information disclosed by a Party ('Disclosing Party') to the other Party ('Receiving Party') during the term of this Agreement, in any form, that is marked or otherwise identified as confidential at the time of disclosure, or that reasonably should be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and circumstances of disclosure. Confidential Information includes, but is not limited to:
(a) Business plans, strategies, financial information, customer lists, vendor lists, and pricing;
(b) Product roadmaps, research and development activities, technology architecture, source code, algorithms, and intellectual property;
(c) User and usage data, engagement metrics, retention data, and related analyses;
(d) Hiring plans, employee information, compensation structures, and organizational plans;
(e) Trade secrets as defined under California Civil Code Section 3426.1 and the Defend Trade Secrets Act;
(f) Individual's prior work product, consulting engagements, client lists, technical capabilities, and professional background;
(g) Any other information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known.
1.2 'Purpose' means the evaluation of a potential co-founding partnership between Individual and Company.
2. CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS
2.1 Receiving Party shall:
(a) Hold Confidential Information in strict confidence and not disclose it to any third party without Disclosing Party's prior written consent;
(b) Use Confidential Information solely for the Purpose and for no other purpose;
(c) Protect Confidential Information using at least the same degree of care that Receiving Party uses to protect its own confidential information, but in no case less than reasonable care;
(d) Notify Disclosing Party promptly upon discovery of any unauthorized use or disclosure of Confidential Information.
3. EXCEPTIONS
3.1 The obligations in Section 2 do not apply to information that:
(a) Is or becomes publicly known through no fault of Receiving Party;
(b) Was lawfully in Receiving Party's possession prior to disclosure by Disclosing Party, without confidentiality obligations;
(c) Is independently developed by Receiving Party without use of or reference to Confidential Information (with written evidence of such independent development);
(d) Is lawfully received from a third party without confidentiality obligations;
(e) Is required to be disclosed by law, regulation, or court order, provided that Receiving Party gives Disclosing Party prompt written notice and cooperates in seeking a protective order.
4. TERM AND TERMINATION
4.1 This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for three (3) years thereafter.
4.2 The confidentiality obligations under Section 2 shall survive termination for a period of three (3) years, except that trade secret obligations shall continue in perpetuity or until the information no longer qualifies as a trade secret.
4.3 Upon termination, Receiving Party shall:
(a) Return all Confidential Information in tangible form, or
(b) Destroy all Confidential Information (including electronic copies) and provide written certification;
(c) Retain no copies except as required by law.
5. NO LICENSE OR OWNERSHIP
Nothing in this Agreement grants Receiving Party any license to or ownership of Confidential Information. All Confidential Information remains the exclusive property of Disclosing Party.
6. REMEDIES
6.1 The Parties acknowledge that breach of this Agreement may cause irreparable harm for which monetary damages are inadequate. Accordingly, Disclosing Party may seek injunctive relief in addition to any other remedies available at law or equity.
6.2 The prevailing Party in any action to enforce this Agreement is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
7. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE
This Agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law provisions. The exclusive venue for any dispute is in the state or federal courts located in [Your County], California.
8. GENERAL
8.1 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties regarding the Purpose.
8.2 If any provision is held unenforceable, the remaining provisions remain in full effect.
8.3 This Agreement is binding upon successors and assigns.
8.4 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including electronic signatures.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.
COMPANY: INDIVIDUAL:
ACME Technologies, Inc.
By: _______________________ _______________________
Name: _____________________ Jane Doe
Title: ____________________
Date: _____________________ Date: _____________________
Key Provisions Explained
Section 1.1 - Confidential Information Definition
Specific categories protect better than 'all information.' Includes industry-standard categories plus your specific use case. Reference to California statutes adds enforceability.
Section 2.1 - 'Purpose' limitation
Information can be used ONLY for co-founder evaluation. Prevents Receiving Party from using info for competitive purposes.
Section 3 - Exceptions
Standard carve-outs. Without these, NDA is unenforceable + courts may void.
Section 4.2 - Post-termination survival
Confidentiality obligations outlast agreement by 3 years. Trade secret obligations perpetual.
Section 6 - Injunctive relief
Allows emergency court action to stop disclosure. Monetary damages often inadequate.
Section 7 - California law + California courts
Your home state for disputes.
Red Flags to Watch (in Other Party's Redlines)
If Jane pushes back on:
1. 'Confidential Information' too broad - legitimate concern. Consider narrower definition.
2. Term - want shorter than 3 years - acceptable to negotiate to 2 years for general business info.
3. Injunctive relief - sometimes parties resist this as 'overreaching'. Reasonable to keep for actual trade secrets.
4. Attorneys fees for prevailing party - occasionally negotiated out. Minor point if you're confident in your position.
5. Governing law outside California - if Jane insists on her state's law, evaluate which state is more favorable.
When to Involve an Attorney
This template is appropriate for:
- Standard co-founder or partnership discussions
- Vendor/contractor evaluations
- Simple business discussions with moderate stakes
Hire attorney if:
- M&A discussions (multi-million dollar deal size)
- Patent-pending technology or specific IP protection required
- International parties (cross-border enforcement complex)
- Healthcare / financial / highly regulated industries
- High likelihood of future dispute
Attorney cost: $400-1,500 for NDA review + customization by a California business attorney.
Execution Workflow
1. Customize the template with specific party names, addresses, signature blocks.
2. Consider attorney review for any high-stakes situation.
3. Send to other party as Word document with redlining enabled.
4. Allow 3-5 business days for redlines.
5. Negotiate any proposed changes via tracked changes.
6. Execute with electronic signatures (DocuSign, Adobe Sign).
7. Maintain executed copies securely.
8. Calendar the 3-year term end date.
Key Takeaways
- Mutual NDA correct for co-founder discussions.
- 3-year duration standard; trade secrets perpetual.
- California law + California venue favorable.
- Specific confidential information categories protect better than vague 'all info'.
- Standard carve-outs mandatory (publicly known, independently developed, legally required).
- Injunctive relief + attorneys fees provide real enforcement.
- Electronic signatures acceptable; maintain secure records.
- Attorney review ($400-1500) worth it for high-stakes discussions.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. This is a simple business NDA template. For complex situations, M&A, IP-heavy discussions, licensed attorney required.
Common use cases
- Co-founder partnership discussions
- Vendor or contractor evaluation
- Investor pitches requiring confidentiality
- M&A exploratory discussions (but attorney required for actual deals)
- Consulting engagements with client confidentiality needs
- Service provider evaluations (legal, accounting, design)
- Industry expert consultations
- Beta tester agreements for products
- Academic / research collaborations
- Any two-party business discussion with confidential elements
Best AI model for this
Claude Opus 4 or GPT-5 Thinking for customization to specific facts. Any LLM for basic template.
Pro tips
- Define 'Confidential Information' specifically. 'All information shared' is too broad; courts may void.
- Reasonable duration: 2-5 years typical for business NDAs. Trade secrets may have longer duration.
- Standard carve-outs mandatory: publicly known, independently developed, legally required, from third party.
- Permitted uses + purposes clearly defined. Prevents expansion of scope.
- Mutual vs one-way: mutual for partnership, one-way for vendor/contractor.
- Return/destruction at end clearly specified.
- Injunctive relief + attorneys fees for prevailing party.
- Governing law + venue in your home state (when possible).
- Electronic signatures (DocuSign, Adobe Sign) acceptable.
- For M&A, patent-pending IP, or international parties, attorney review required.
Customization tips
- For ONE-WAY NDA (vendor/contractor receiving your info), simplify: only you define what's confidential, only they have obligations. Shorter + cleaner.
- For M&A NDAs, significantly more complex. Reverse trigger clauses, representations + warranties, standstill provisions, no-solicitation clauses. Attorney required.
- For EMPLOYMENT-ADJACENT NDAs (new hire, prior to employment contract), often replaced by the employment contract's confidentiality clauses.
- For INVESTOR DUE-DILIGENCE NDAs, investors often refuse to sign them ('NDAs are not fundable'). Standard practice in VC.
- For INTERNATIONAL NDAs, jurisdiction complexity significant. Choose one governing law + mutual arbitration venue. International enforcement more complex.
- For CALIFORNIA specifically, strong trade secret protection + employee protection. Non-compete clauses in NDAs are void.
- For TEXAS / NY / FLORIDA, NDAs generally enforceable including non-compete-adjacent restrictions.
- For TRADE SECRETS specifically, Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides strong federal-court options for protection.
- For CLASSIFIED / GOVERNMENT work, standard commercial NDAs insufficient. Security clearance processes + specific government NDAs required.
- If the OTHER PARTY sends you their NDA to sign, review carefully with red-flag framework. Don't just sign without review.
Variants
Mutual NDA (co-founder/partnership)
Both parties share confidential information
One-Way NDA (vendor/contractor)
Only receiver bound, simpler + cleaner
Investor NDA
Often refused by VCs; for angel/seed situations
Consultant / Service Provider
Professional services context
Beta Tester / Early User
Product testing with confidentiality
Industry Expert Consultation
One-time expert engagement
California-specific
Non-compete void, strong trade secret protection
Frequently asked questions
How do I use the Simple NDA Drafter prompt?
Open the prompt page, click 'Copy prompt', paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, and replace the placeholders in curly braces with your real input. The prompt is also launchable directly in each model with one click.
Which AI model works best with Simple NDA Drafter?
Claude Opus 4 or GPT-5 Thinking for customization to specific facts. Any LLM for basic template.
Can I customize the Simple NDA Drafter prompt for my use case?
Yes — every Promptolis Original is designed to be customized. Key levers: Define 'Confidential Information' specifically. 'All information shared' is too broad; courts may void.; Reasonable duration: 2-5 years typical for business NDAs. Trade secrets may have longer duration.
Explore more Originals
Hand-crafted 2026-grade prompts that actually change how you work.
← All Promptolis Originals