💻 Coding & Development

Software Quality Assurance Tester

📁 Coding & Development 👤 Contributed by @iuzn 🗓️ Updated
The prompt
I want you to act as a software quality assurance tester for a new software application. Your job is to test the functionality and performance of the software to ensure it meets the required standards. You will need to write detailed reports on any issues or bugs you encounter, and provide recommendations for improvement. Do not include any personal opinions or subjective evaluations in your reports. Your first task is to test the login functionality of the software.

Example outputs

Here is what ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini typically return for this prompt:

🚀 ChatGPT

**Test Report: Login Functionality** **Test Cases Executed:** 1) Valid credentials input, 2) Invalid username, 3) Invalid password, 4) Empty fields, 5) SQL injection attempt, 6) Session timeout. **Issues Found:** Login accepts spaces in password field (potential security risk), no rate limiting detected after 10 failed attempts, error messages reveal whether username exists (security vulnerability). **Recommendations:** Implement CAPTCHA after 3 failed attempts, sanitize all input fields, use generic error messages, add session management with 15-minute timeout.

✨ Claude

**Login Functionality Test Report** Tested scenarios include valid/invalid credentials, empty fields, special characters, and concurrent sessions. Critical issue identified: password field accepts unlimited length input (tested up to 10,000 characters), causing 8-second response delay. Additionally, failed login attempts return different error codes for non-existent versus incorrect passwords, creating an information disclosure vulnerability. Recommend implementing input validation with 128-character maximum and standardizing all authentication error responses.

💎 Gemini

**QA Test Report – Login Module** Functional tests conducted on authentication endpoint. Bug detected: system allows login with case-sensitive username but documentation specifies case-insensitive behavior (inconsistency). Performance metric: average login time 1.2 seconds under normal load, degrades to 4.7 seconds with 50 concurrent users. Recommendation: normalize username input to lowercase, optimize database query indexing on user table, implement connection pooling to handle concurrent authentication requests.

How to use this prompt

Copy the prompt above or click an "Open in" button to launch it directly in your preferred AI. You can then customize the wording to match your exact use case — for example replacing placeholders like [your topic] with real context.

Which AI model works best

Claude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4.6 generally outperform ChatGPT and Gemini on coding tasks — better reasoning, better at handling long context (full files, multi-file projects), and more honest about uncertainty. ChatGPT is faster for quick snippets; Gemini is best when code involves screenshots or visual context.

How to customize this prompt

Swap the language mentioned in the prompt (Python, JavaScript, etc.) for whichever stack you're on. For debugging or code review, paste your actual code right after the prompt. For generation tasks, specify the framework (React, Vue, Django, FastAPI) and any constraints (max lines, no external libraries, must be async).

Common use cases

  • Writing production code with strict style requirements
  • Reviewing pull requests and catching bugs before merge
  • Converting between languages (Python → TypeScript, for example)
  • Generating unit tests for existing functions
  • Explaining unfamiliar codebases to new team members

Variations

Adapt the tone (more casual, more technical), change the output format (bullet points vs. paragraphs), or add constraints (word limits, target audience).

Related prompts