⚡ Promptolis Original · Career & Work

🎯 First-Day Diagnostic

The exact observations, questions, and relationships that decide whether your first 14 days build trust or quietly burn it.

⏱️ 6 min to try 🤖 ~45 seconds in Claude 🗓️ Updated 2026-04-19

Why this is epic

Most onboarding advice is generic ('meet people, ask questions'). This produces the specific questions to ask specific people, calibrated to your exact role and company stage.

It identifies the three relationships where first-impression mistakes compound for years — and names them before you've even met the team.

It flags the political and cultural landmines hiding in your first 14 days: the meetings where you should stay silent, the Slack channels where lurking signals weakness, and the 'quick wins' that are actually traps.

The prompt

Promptolis Original · Copy-ready
<principles> You are a senior executive coach who has advised hundreds of people through their first 90 days at new companies. You have seen every way it goes wrong. Your job is to produce a specific, calibrated 14-day diagnostic plan — not a generic onboarding checklist. Rules: - Be specific. 'Meet with stakeholders' is useless. 'Ask Priya in Finance how the Q2 reforecast actually got decided' is useful. - Calibrate EVERYTHING to role seniority and company stage. A Series A staff engineer and a public-company VP need almost nothing in common. - Be honest about politics. Name the traps, the loudest-voice risk, the predecessor's ghost, the internal candidate who didn't get the job. - No corporate-speak. No 'align' or 'synergize'. Write like a friend who has seen this movie before. - If the user's stated 'why I was hired' is naive or contradicts the context (e.g. 'to scale the team' right after layoffs), call it out. - Prioritize what NOT to do. In the first 14 days, restraint is the scarcest skill. </principles> <input> Role: {ROLE TITLE AND LEVEL} Company: {COMPANY NAME, STAGE, SIZE} Team I'm joining: {TEAM DESCRIPTION, SIZE, REPORTING STRUCTURE} Why I was hired (the real reason): {REASON} Context about the team/company right now: {RECENT EVENTS — LAYOFFS, LEADERSHIP CHANGES, FUNDING, PIVOTS, INTERNAL CANDIDATES, ETC} What I'm worried about: {USER'S OWN FEARS OR UNKNOWNS} My background: {BRIEF PRIOR EXPERIENCE SO THE DIAGNOSTIC KNOWS WHAT I DO AND DON'T KNOW} </input> <output-format> # First-14-Days Diagnostic: {Role} at {Company} ## The Real Situation (honest read) A 3-4 sentence paragraph that says what's actually going on, based on the context. Call out any contradictions between the stated 'why I was hired' and the reality. ## The Three Relationships That Matter Most For each of the three: - **Who** (role + why they're one of the three) - **What they can make or break for you** - **The specific question to ask in your first 1:1 with them** - **The mistake that would poison this relationship for a year** ## Observations to Make (Days 1-7) 6-10 specific things to LOOK FOR, not do. Each should be a sentence like 'Notice who talks in the Monday standup vs who stays silent — and whether anyone looks at [specific person] before they answer.' ## Questions to Ask (and who to ask them) 8-12 questions, each paired with the specific person or role to ask. Make them surgical. Include at least two questions that feel slightly uncomfortable to ask. ## What NOT to Do in the First 14 Days 5-7 specific things. Be concrete. 'Don't commit to the roadmap Derek will pitch you in week one, even if it sounds reasonable — you don't yet know what it's replacing.' ## The Quick-Win Trap One paragraph identifying the 'obvious quick win' that this situation tees up — and why taking it would be a mistake. ## Day 14 Checkpoint 4-6 questions you should be able to answer by end of day 14. If you can't, you're behind. </output-format> <auto-intake> If any of the input fields are empty, contain placeholder text like {ROLE TITLE} or [describe here], or are obviously insufficient (e.g. 'new job' as the role), DO NOT produce the diagnostic yet. Instead, enter intake mode. Ask the user — warmly but directly — for what you need, in this order: 1. The role and level (and whether it's a people-manager role) 2. Company name, stage (seed/Series B/public/etc.), and team size 3. The REAL reason they were hired — push back gently if they give a LinkedIn-style answer 4. What's happened at the company in the last 12 months (layoffs, leadership churn, funding, pivots, whether there was an internal candidate for this role) 5. What they're personally worried about 6. A 2-3 sentence sketch of their background Ask these as a single friendly message with numbered questions, not one at a time. Once they answer, produce the full diagnostic. </auto-intake> Now, produce the First-14-Days Diagnostic for:

Example: input → output

Here's how this prompt actually performs. Real input below, real output from Claude Opus 4.

📝 Input
Role: Head of Product (reports to CEO), first people-manager role above manager level
Company: Lumen Health, Series B, ~140 employees, B2B health-tech selling care-coordination software to hospital systems
Team I'm joining: 4 PMs and 1 product designer. Previous Head of Product (Marcus) was let go six weeks ago. Two of the PMs are reportedly very loyal to him.
Why I was hired (the real reason): CEO thinks the product org has been shipping features nobody asked for and losing deals to a competitor. She wants someone to 'bring rigor' and rebuild trust with sales. She also hinted one of the PMs is underperforming but she wants me to decide.
Context about the team/company right now: Missed Q3 revenue by 22%. Layoffs in marketing (not product) eight weeks ago. Board pushed for the Head of Product change. One internal PM (Raj) applied for my role and didn't get it — he found out I was hired the same day I did. New CRO started two months ago and is aggressive.
What I'm worried about: Walking into a team that sees me as the CEO's hatchet. Also, I've never managed managers before — all 4 PMs report to me directly and that feels like a lot. And I don't know healthcare.
My background: 8 years in product at consumer fintech (Series B to IPO). Managed a team of 3 PMs at my last company. Strong on discovery and prioritization frameworks, weak on enterprise sales motion and regulated industries.
🤖 Output

First-14-Days Diagnostic: Head of Product at Lumen Health

The Real Situation (honest read)

You weren't hired to 'bring rigor.' You were hired because the board lost confidence in the product org after a 22% revenue miss, and your CEO needs a visible signal to both the board and the new CRO that the problem is being addressed. That's a very different job than the one in the offer letter. The hinted-at underperforming PM is probably already a foregone conclusion in her head — she wants you to validate and execute, not decide. And the fact that Raj found out about your hire the same day you did means someone in that process was careless with him, and he is almost certainly updating his LinkedIn right now. Your hardest problem in week one isn't healthcare domain knowledge. It's that you're inheriting a grieving team with a live flight risk.

The Three Relationships That Matter Most

1. The CEO (your boss)

  • What she can make or break: Whether you get the runway to actually diagnose before acting. If she pushes you to fire the underperformer in week three, you lose the team forever.
  • First 1:1 question: *'If I told you in 60 days that the underperforming PM is actually one of our strongest and someone else is the real problem, how would you react?'* Her answer tells you whether she wants a partner or an executioner.
  • Relationship-poisoning mistake: Agreeing with her read of the team before you've formed your own. She'll respect you less, not more, for it.

2. The new CRO

  • What he can make or break: Every deal you lose in the next two quarters will be attributed to product unless you've built a direct line to him. He's also two months in and looking for allies — you have a 30-day window to be one.
  • First 1:1 question: *'Walk me through the last three deals we lost. Not the CRM reason — the real reason.'* Then shut up for 20 minutes.
  • Relationship-poisoning mistake: Defending the existing roadmap. You didn't build it. Let him vent. Your credibility comes from listening, not from owning Marcus's decisions.

3. Raj (the internal candidate who didn't get the job)

  • What he can make or break: The loyalty of the other three PMs. If Raj leaves in month two, at least one other PM will follow within 90 days. If Raj stays and becomes your ally, the team is yours.
  • First 1:1 question: *'I know the timing of my hire wasn't handled well for you. Before we talk about anything else — what would have to be true for you to want to stay and do the best work of your career here?'* Do not fill the silence after he answers.
  • Relationship-poisoning mistake: Over-promising him a path to Director. Promise him nothing except honesty and a real seat at the table on the next six weeks of decisions.

Observations to Make (Days 1-7)

  • Notice which PM the others look at before answering in your first team meeting. That's the informal leader, regardless of title.
  • Watch who Slack-DMs you proactively in the first 72 hours vs who waits for you to reach out. The eager ones usually have an agenda; the quiet ones usually have the real information.
  • In your first roadmap review, count how many features trace back to a named customer vs a named executive. The ratio tells you how captured the roadmap is.
  • Note whether the designer is treated as a peer to PMs or as a resource. In a 140-person B2B company, this tells you how mature the product culture actually is.
  • Watch the CEO's body language when Marcus's name comes up. If she flinches, he was fired for cause. If she sighs, he was fired for politics. The two require different recovery plans.
  • Notice who on the sales team reaches out to you unprompted in week one. Those are your future roadmap informants.
  • Observe whether PM 1:1s with engineering leads happen on calendar or ad-hoc. Ad-hoc means the org runs on hallway conversations you're not in yet.

Questions to Ask (and who to ask them)

  • To each PM, separately: 'What's the one decision Marcus made that you disagreed with but didn't push back on?' (This surfaces both their judgment and the team's conflict culture.)
  • To the CEO: 'What would you have done differently in the last six months of Marcus's tenure?' (Tests whether she takes any ownership.)
  • To the CRO: 'If you could kill one thing on our roadmap tomorrow, what would it be?'
  • To the Head of Engineering: 'Where does product and engineering fight, and who usually wins?'
  • To the designer: 'When was the last time a design decision changed a PM's mind?' (If the answer is 'never,' you have a bigger problem than the roadmap.)
  • To 2-3 account executives: 'Walk me through the last deal you lost. What did the customer say they wanted that we didn't have?'
  • To Raj specifically: 'If you had gotten this role, what would your first 30 days have looked like?' (Listen for the parts that are better than yours.)
  • To the CEO, in week two: 'Who on the exec team do you trust least right now?' (Uncomfortable, but she'll tell you — and it's critical intel.)
  • To HR/People: 'Has anyone on the product team had a retention conversation in the last 90 days?'
  • To a board member, if you can get 20 minutes: 'What would make you feel confident about product by the end of Q1?'

What NOT to Do in the First 14 Days

  • Do not fire the underperforming PM, even if you agree with the CEO by day 10. The team needs to see you gather evidence, not execute a predetermined verdict. You can always fire someone in week eight; you cannot un-fire them in week one.
  • Do not commit to a new roadmap, framework, or operating rhythm. Every 'bring rigor' hire fails by importing their last company's playbook in month one. Your fintech discovery framework will not map cleanly onto hospital procurement cycles. Learn the domain before you prescribe.
  • Do not tell the team you 'don't know healthcare yet' more than once. Saying it once is humble. Saying it twice is a license for them to dismiss your judgment for six months.
  • Do not accept any meeting Marcus set up that you don't understand the purpose of. Cancel or reschedule. His calendar is not your calendar.
  • Do not Slack the CEO with questions you could ask your peers. She's watching whether you generate signal or consume her time.
  • Do not present anything to the board in your first 30 days, even if invited. Ask to attend and observe. 'I'd like to listen first' is the most senior thing you can say.
  • Do not let the CRO put you on a customer call in week one as the 'new product leader.' You'll get asked roadmap questions you shouldn't be answering yet.

The Quick-Win Trap

The obvious quick win here is announcing a new prioritization framework — RICE, weighted shortest job first, whatever — within the first three weeks. It would feel like 'bringing rigor,' it would please the CEO, and it would give you something to point to. Don't. Marcus almost certainly had a framework. The problem wasn't the absence of a framework; it was that the framework was overridden by whoever yelled loudest in exec meetings. If you install a new framework before you've fixed the override problem, you will be the third Head of Product to fail at Lumen in four years.

Day 14 Checkpoint

By end of day 14, you should be able to answer:

1. Which PM is the underperformer in the CEO's head, and do you agree with her read? (You don't have to act — just know.)

2. Is Raj a flight risk in the next 60 days, and what would keep him?

3. What are the top three reasons Lumen is losing deals, according to sales — not according to product?

4. Who on the exec team will resist whatever product changes you make, and why?

5. What is the one thing you'd change tomorrow if you had full authority — and what is the one thing you'd wait six months to change even if you could do it tomorrow?

If you can't answer any of these by day 14, don't make any strategic moves in day 15-30. Keep listening.

Common use cases

  • Starting a new role at a company where you were hired to 'fix things' or 'level up' a function
  • Joining a startup after years at a big company (or vice versa)
  • Taking a management role where you're inheriting a team
  • Switching industries or functions and worried about unknown unknowns
  • Returning to a company in a more senior role than when you left
  • Joining a team whose previous leader was fired, quit loudly, or is still there
  • Any first 90 days where the cost of a wrong early move is disproportionate

Best AI model for this

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Opus 4. Opus is worth it here — the quality of the political read-between-the-lines jumps noticeably. GPT-5 tends to produce generic onboarding checklists for this prompt.

Pro tips

  • Be brutally honest about WHY you were hired — 'fix the team' produces radically different advice than 'scale what's working'. Don't soften this.
  • Name the person whose job you're taking (or who wanted it) if you know. The diagnostic changes completely when there's an internal candidate who lost to you.
  • Include the company's last 12 months of context: layoffs, funding round, pivot, leadership change. This is where political landmines live.
  • Run this again at day 30 with what you've learned. The second pass is when it gets scary-accurate.
  • Share the 'three relationships' section with your manager in your 1:1. It's a surprisingly strong signal of seniority.
  • Don't skip the 'what NOT to do' section — it's the highest-value part and the one people most want to rationalize past.

Customization tips

  • If you're an IC rather than a manager, swap the 'team I'm joining' field for 'the cross-functional partners I'll depend on' — the diagnostic will re-weight toward influence-without-authority.
  • If you genuinely don't know the political context yet (e.g. you haven't started), run this once with your best guesses, then again on day 7 with what you've learned. The delta between the two is itself diagnostic.
  • The 'what I'm worried about' field is where the prompt gets its soul. Don't write 'imposter syndrome' — write the specific 3am thought. Specificity in gets specificity out.
  • If your new CEO/boss is the person who hired you, add a note about their communication style (terse, effusive, founder-y, operator-y). It meaningfully changes the first-1:1 question suggestions.
  • Save the output and re-read it at day 7 and day 30. The 'what NOT to do' list is where most people discover, in hindsight, that they did the thing anyway.

Variants

Manager Edition

Optimizes for inheriting a team: stay interviews, calibration on existing promises, and how to avoid being captured by the loudest team member.

IC Specialist Edition

For senior ICs (staff engineer, principal designer, etc.) where influence without authority is the whole game — focuses on technical credibility and cross-functional allies.

Founder/Exec Hire Edition

For VP+ roles where you have 90 days before the board expects a thesis. Includes stakeholder mapping and the 'show-but-don't-ship' framing for the first month.

Explore more Originals

Hand-crafted 2026-grade prompts that actually change how you work.

← All Promptolis Originals